Police say people are unduly worried about crime in one of safest counties in UK (From Banbury Cake)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Police say people are unduly worried about crime in one of safest counties in UK
7:20pm Saturday 18th August 2012 in News
By Ben Wilkinson, Crime Reporter. Call me on (01865) 425427
Colin Paine
RESIDENTS are still “unduly worried” about crime, despite a drop in offending across Oxfordshire, according to a senior police officer.
Figures released by Thames Valley Police show crime has fallen by up to 18 per cent across the county.
The statistics are from April 1 to July 31 and are compared to the same four -month period last year.
Although crime overall is down, a number of offences saw increases in certain parts of the county, in particular sex crimes.
Serious sexual offences in the Vale of White Horse and South Oxfordshire rose by 26 per cent from 27 to 34, with rape reports rising from 11 to 15, a hike of 36 per cent.
And only one in 10 of these resulted in a charge, caution or convictrion which means South and Vale district police have missed their target of one in three.
Overall crime in South and Vale is down though, by 18 per cent, from 3,766 offences last year to 3,091 this year.
More of these offences are being dealt with successfully, with a rise in detection rate – crimes that result in a caution, charge or conviction – from 24 per cent to 26 per cent. In West Oxfordshire, the total number of offences fell by 12 per cent, from 1,461 crimes committed to 1,290.
Detections also rose slightly from 25 to 26 per cent.
Chief Inspector Colin Paine, area commander for the district, said: “It’s early days, but overall I am pleased.
“Although this really is one of the safest places to live in England, some people remain unduly worried about crime.
“I hope these figures will go some way to reassure them.”
But there have been slight rises in burglary, violence against the person with injury, and assault without injury. Domestic burglaries have gone up from 33 to 36, violence against the person from 123 to 132, and assault without injury rose from 87 to 95.
Mr Paine added: “We’ve had three more burglaries than this time last year. To be fair, last year was the lowest level of burglaries on record.”
He also said it was important residents reported suspicious activity to keep crime down.
And in Cherwell all crime fell also by 12 per cent, from 2,901 offences to 2,563.
Detection rates have gone up more significantly, rising from 26 to 34 per cent.
But Philip Walker, who in April fought off armed raiders from his Didcot home, said he did not believe the statistics.
The 53-year-old said: “It hasn’t gone down. It’s ripe in Didcot.”
Andy Viney, secretary of Thames Valley Police Federation, said last year the force cut about 100 police officers across the Thames Valley region and further cuts were expected.
He said: “These figures are to be celebrated. It shows how hard working the officers are in both the prevention and detection of crime. But with the austerity challenges we shouldn’t be complacent as these figures could easily rise as the effects of the cuts start to bite.”
Last week the Oxford Mail reported how crime in Oxford had fallen 15 per cent from 6,087 to 5,175 during the same period.
Domestic burglaries had fallen 26 per cent, with police saying they had locked up offenders and targeted the drug dealers fuelling the problem.
Carterton resident Cara Langstaff, whose 13-year-old son Thomas had his bike handlebars stolen last year, said: “I don’t feel uncomfortable safety wise but you do have to look after your property.”
The 37-year-old added: “Even when my bikes are locked up I feel uncomfortable.”
- Street-by-street crime statistics are available at oxfordmail.co.uk/li
Comments(32)
Additional information
says...
10:37pm Sat 18 Aug 12
This is very crafty and deceipful of Thames Valley Police to manupulate the figures in this way.
Obviously they are once again attempting to misguide the local public...shame on them!
Geoff Roberts
says...
11:38pm Sat 18 Aug 12
Easily. I could punch you in the forehead without injuring you. You wouldn't like it though.
Phian
says...
4:31am Sun 19 Aug 12
Feelingsmatter wrote:An assault is an act by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence so one does not have to actually strike someone, just make them fear you will. If you do actually hit therm, it is termed "battery" so one would be charged (sorry, couldn't resist)
Unduly worried? How can you be assaulted without injury? There are lies, **** lies and statistics ...............
Lord Palmerstone
says...
9:21am Sun 19 Aug 12
And only one in 10 of these resulted in a charge, caution or convictrion which means South and Vale district police have missed their target of one in three."
Who gave them a "target"? Our very unpleasant State. Despite The decency displayed by Brits like the Olympic volunteers we do now have a deeply unattractice state.
If burglaries of peoples' homes has increased then we are all entitled to be fearful.
Inarticulate people with unsatisfactory relationships, young drunken males beating each other,spurious claims of sexual misdemeanours made by the intoxicated, these things keep few awake at night. Burglaries do keep us awake.
nafnlaus
says...
9:32am Sun 19 Aug 12
Phian wrote:The most common assault reported on these pages is ‘Assault by beating’. This is the lowest form of assault dealt with by the police and occurs when some physical event takes place without injury i.e. a push or shove or an injury in law which is less than ABH. (Actual Bodily Harm).
Feelingsmatter wrote:An assault is an act by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence so one does not have to actually strike someone, just make them fear you will. If you do actually hit therm, it is termed "battery" so one would be charged (sorry, couldn't resist)
Unduly worried? How can you be assaulted without injury? There are lies, **** lies and statistics ...............
Cathena
says...
9:41am Sun 19 Aug 12
Feelingsmatter
says...
10:26am Sun 19 Aug 12
Geoff Roberts wrote:I would still be injured mentally. And I would probably still have a bit of a bruise, especially if you had bony knuckles.
"How can you be assaulted without injury?"
Easily. I could punch you in the forehead without injuring you. You wouldn't like it though.
Myron Blatz
says...
10:41am Sun 19 Aug 12
MrBBump
says...
11:00am Sun 19 Aug 12
pjpj
says...
11:28am Sun 19 Aug 12
John Lamb
says...
2:41pm Sun 19 Aug 12
pjpj
says...
4:46pm Sun 19 Aug 12
John Lamb wrote:Ha! Ha! Yeah The investigation into that probably culminated in a few thousand hours overtime.
I think crime must have dipped to a low level at some point as TVP resorted to shooting each other to up the figures.
BeverleyAnne
says...
6:55pm Sun 19 Aug 12
Man on the Green
says...
9:16pm Sun 19 Aug 12
Feelingsmatter
says...
10:05pm Sun 19 Aug 12
Kingston Road Crusader Ox2 6EG wrote:No, but sex offenders rarely get custodial sentences. There have been a string of paedophiles who have been given non-custodial sentences, including a GP, an RAF mechanic and a teacher. Sex offenders in Oxfordshire can expect to get an easy journey through our judicial system. Many cases have been covered on this site.
Man on the Green wrote:I do not understand where you and others get the idea that an admitted or convicted rape is dealt with a caution. That has never been the case in Oxford.
It's hard to conceive of circumstances in which an admitted rape could justifiably be dealt with by way of a caution.
Christine Hovis
says...
8:50am Mon 20 Aug 12
This story appears sandwiched between reports of a murder, affray in Witney and threatening with a knife in a Cowley Road cafe.
Maybe if it wasn't such easy reporting, we would have a very low experience of the very low crime rate.
Myron Blatz
says...
9:56am Mon 20 Aug 12
xjohnx
says...
11:25am Mon 20 Aug 12
Oh! and Ian Thomlinson is living in the forests of Brazil.
xjohnx
says...
11:28am Mon 20 Aug 12
John Lamb wrote:Is that 'John Lamb' the famous Marine Engineer?
I think crime must have dipped to a low level at some point as TVP resorted to shooting each other to up the figures.
Rachie53
says...
11:55am Tue 21 Aug 12
John Lamb
says...
1:31pm Tue 21 Aug 12
locodogz
says...
1:34pm Tue 21 Aug 12
The 53-year-old said: “It hasn’t gone down. It’s ripe in Didcot.”"
Ripe? Did he mean 'rife' or is he a bit of a fruit.......?
Buffetcrasher
says...
2:18pm Tue 21 Aug 12
locodogz
says...
4:00pm Tue 21 Aug 12
Buffetcrasher wrote:Sorry I genuinely don't get what you're saying here? You say he was assaulted and the charge was assault? Had they taken the phone presumably it would have been 'robbery with assault' or something similar? How is that a downgraded charge?
My son was assaulted and some yobs tried to take his phone back in May; his head was cut and his glasses broken. It was downgraded to assault as they didn't get his phone. Hmmm.
HPG
says...
9:40pm Tue 21 Aug 12
Friend, punched in head several times walking home, police caught up with us, they know who done it, say they saw it on cctv, is he ok, give us a buisness card and say ring if you wanna make complaint against this guy.....just get on and do your job mr policeman
Buffetcrasher
says...
10:47am Wed 22 Aug 12
locodogz wrote:"Assault and robbery" would have been the charge if they'd actually got away with the phone. "Attempted robbery with assault" was the charge we wanted to be recorded as it is a more serious crime and the sentence, had they been caught, would therefore be harsher. The crime was recorded as "assault" which is less serious and looks better on crime statistics. Sorry I was unclear.
Buffetcrasher wrote:Sorry I genuinely don't get what you're saying here? You say he was assaulted and the charge was assault? Had they taken the phone presumably it would have been 'robbery with assault' or something similar? How is that a downgraded charge?
My son was assaulted and some yobs tried to take his phone back in May; his head was cut and his glasses broken. It was downgraded to assault as they didn't get his phone. Hmmm.
locodogz
says...
11:51am Wed 22 Aug 12
Buffetcrasher wrote:Ah now I understand - did they give any explanation as to why they dropped the "attempted robbery" bit?
locodogz wrote:"Assault and robbery" would have been the charge if they'd actually got away with the phone. "Attempted robbery with assault" was the charge we wanted to be recorded as it is a more serious crime and the sentence, had they been caught, would therefore be harsher. The crime was recorded as "assault" which is less serious and looks better on crime statistics. Sorry I was unclear.
Buffetcrasher wrote:Sorry I genuinely don't get what you're saying here? You say he was assaulted and the charge was assault? Had they taken the phone presumably it would have been 'robbery with assault' or something similar? How is that a downgraded charge?
My son was assaulted and some yobs tried to take his phone back in May; his head was cut and his glasses broken. It was downgraded to assault as they didn't get his phone. Hmmm.
davyboy
says...
5:11pm Wed 22 Aug 12
Feelingsmatter
says...
9:54pm Wed 22 Aug 12
locodogz wrote:It was better for their statistics! At least they were honest!
Buffetcrasher wrote:Ah now I understand - did they give any explanation as to why they dropped the "attempted robbery" bit?
locodogz wrote:"Assault and robbery" would have been the charge if they'd actually got away with the phone. "Attempted robbery with assault" was the charge we wanted to be recorded as it is a more serious crime and the sentence, had they been caught, would therefore be harsher. The crime was recorded as "assault" which is less serious and looks better on crime statistics. Sorry I was unclear.
Buffetcrasher wrote:Sorry I genuinely don't get what you're saying here? You say he was assaulted and the charge was assault? Had they taken the phone presumably it would have been 'robbery with assault' or something similar? How is that a downgraded charge?
My son was assaulted and some yobs tried to take his phone back in May; his head was cut and his glasses broken. It was downgraded to assault as they didn't get his phone. Hmmm.
Myron Blatz
says...
2:07am Thu 23 Aug 12
JanetJ
says...
6:50pm Thu 23 Aug 12
HPG wrote:So - did he ring?
Figures are down because the police wont do there jobs.
Friend, punched in head several times walking home, police caught up with us, they know who done it, say they saw it on cctv, is he ok, give us a buisness card and say ring if you wanna make complaint against this guy.....just get on and do your job mr policeman
Feelingsmatter says...
9:24pm Sat 18 Aug 12