News RSS Feed


Strong opposition to incinerator bid


Feelings ran high in Sutton Courtenay as hundreds of villagers gathered to voice objections to plans for a £1bn incinerator near their homes.

It was standing room only as more than 250 residents from Sutton Courtenay, Appleford and Drayton packed All Saints Church for an extraordinary parish council meeting last night.

And, in an unanimous vote, Sutton Courtenay Parish Council agreed to strongly object to the giant rubbish burning facility, capable of burning 300,000 tonnes of waste a year.

Waste Recycling Group, which owns the Sutton Courtenay landfill site, put in a planning application to build the incinerator on the site in July. The Spanish-owned firm is in competition for the county's incinerator contract with Viridor, which runs the other major landfill site in Oxfordshire, at Ardley.

Oxfordshire County Council will make the final decision on the bid early next year, following its own period of consultation.

Among residents' concerns were the impact the incinerator would have on roads, noise, potential health hazards, and the effect on rare newts living near the site.

Some called for direct action to halt the bid, while others suggested an expert critique of the plans and environmental impact assessment was the way forward.

Local MP Ed Vaizey pledged his support to protesters and residents quizzed their elected representatives from the county and district councils, Colin Lamont and Gervase Duffield, on the planning process.

Callum Mackenzie, 53, of Drayton Road, Sutton Courtenay, a member of Sutton Courtenay Action Group, said: "The anger about this proposal is so intense. People just can't believe it. We are continuing the fight and welcome any support that we can to fight this.

"You only have to walk between Sutton Courtenay and Didcot to see the landfill site, it's a disgusting, horrible mess.

"To think of doing this kind of thing without considering new technologies is unthinkable."

The group wants to galvanise the support of local legal and environmental experts in a bid to get the plans thrown out.

Michael Jenkins, the parish council's chairman, said: "We decided to strongly oppose the application. The decision was that we would request conditions for the site should that application be approved.

"I don't think its Nimbyism in Sutton Courtenay. Residents have been particularly tolerant of a lot of operation conditions over the years and they do have genuine concerns about the presence of an incinerator and the health issues.

He said: "I wouldn't be surprised if both the applications for the incinerator were approved because if they weren't, Oxfordshire County Council would be left with no solution to its problem."

Earlier this month, Didcot councillors backed the controversial plans for an incinerator on the town's doorstep. Didcot Town Council said it was keen to see a reduction in landfill and welcomed the possibility of a £1bn incinerator at Sutton Courtenay.

Mr Jenkins said: "Didcot Town Council is entitled to reach their own conclusion, but I feel disappointed that people in that area haven't been as well as informed of the main problems associated with incineration."


Your Say YourBanbury

Gunslinger, Abingdon says...
2:52pm Tue 16 Sep 08

While I do understand that some people feel strongly about this:
(a) rubbish has to go somewhere
(b) as I understand it, the proposed site is literally in the shadow of Didcot power station, and has both a history of, and the infrastructure for, waste disposal going back over many decades
(c) once again we see self appointed 'experts' getting up and whipping up understandable public concerns with vague references to 'health risks' and 'better' technologies without precisely saying what these are and why other 'experts' apparently do not agree. Shades of the MMR scare?

Could we perhaps see some rather more balanced coverage in future?

walkden, says...
5:29pm Wed 17 Sep 08

In the summer before EU discussions on the waste hierarchy a Medical Assoiciation representing 33,000 doctors lobbied to have incineration considered as detrimental as landfill in policy terms. Landfill as you may know has to be phased out.
Better technologies are ones which such as MBT in which the methane can be captured and used for energy while producing less carbon dioxide and a residue which is not toxic. While incineration may reduce the methane from landfill sites it produces a great deal of carbon dioxide and hazardous waste. That is the technical term it is not a 'scare-mongering' one. Part of the planning application at Sutton Courtenay is to dispose of this hazardous waste on site. However, the geology is one of sand and gravel the water table is high and it's near an aquifer. I think if I lived there I'd be worried too.

Your sayYour Banbury

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Banbury Cake account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.

Strong opposition to incinerator bid Strong opposition to incinerator bid

Stay with Prague Hotels | Visit Spain with Barcelona Hotels

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »