I am writing regarding the article (Gardener takes a line on crossing plan, September 2). Much as it would alleviate traffic congestion around the city, I regret that my resources are not quite sufficient to allow me to extend the railway network myself.

Rather, my objective in making my application to the city council (ref 13/02156/CEU) is to ensure that the railway development plans are properly scrutinised. The law is clear: the scheme should be open to the public consultation and evaluation that is provided under current planning legislation.

Unfortunately it appears that the council and Network Rail are in league to carry out their work as if no consultation is needed. Without protective conditions the scheme could result in increased railway traffic thundering through the city at high speed and at all hours.

Those who live near the railway line, if they were given that opportunity, might, for instance, wish to ask for a night-time speed restriction on much larger freight trains as they thunder through the city so they are not shaken out of bed.

My objective is not to stop the development, but for the pedestrian level crossing that leads to the allotment gardens to be fitted with miniature signal lights, so that we can continue to improve on the 175-year safe record of this very useful and valuable amenity.

Ian Salisbury, Becket Street, Oxford