Today's most viewed
| NEWS |  | | | CINEMA | | | | SPORT | |
|
|
|
Eco-town approach may be unlawful
The Government's approach to delivering a series of eco-towns could be "unlawful", lawyers advising local councils have warned.
Ministers are using a new planning policy statement (PPS), to be published later in the summer, to set out the standards and potential locations for the environmentally sustainable new settlements.
But lawyers engaged by the Local Government Association (LGA) said the proposals go against the principle of the current system of development through plans drawn up by local authorities, and could be open to legal challenge.
John Steel QC and James Strachan also said an existing PPS covered the concept of providing housing in new settlements in an environmentally sustainable way. As a result, there did not seem to be any justification for promoting eco-towns outside the existing rules, "other than the Government's wish to avoid the system due to the proper need for scrutiny, which takes time", they said. The LGA said the legal advice showed the Government's approach to eco-towns was "deeply flawed".
The Association's chairman Sir Simon Milton said the LGA was not opposed to the eco-towns as a way of meeting housing needs and combating climate change. But he said there were concerns the current proposals would bypass local planning processes to impose the schemes on the public and councils.
He urged: "Ministers must talk to council leaders about adopting a new approach that will deliver development in places where councils and local people agree that eco-towns can work. Eco-towns must be delivered without bypassing the planning processes and ensure that new developments have good transport connections alongside the schools, health and leisure facilities which are needed to create places where people would want to live."
A spokesman for the Department for Communities and Local Government said: "We absolutely disagree with the LGA's claims and believe this legal advice can only have been obtained on the basis of a misrepresentation of our policy.
"We have made it absolutely clear throughout that eco-towns will be different and will have higher environmental standards than a normal development and the applications will also have to be considered through the normal planning process."
8:48am Wednesday 23rd July 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: Adrian, Didcot on 11:29am Wed 23 Jul 08
If it wasn't just a shoddy attempt to build houses in green belt it might even get some support. Even as is now it never ceases to amaze me how people with money still ride roughshod over locals and planning laws all the time. (not always winning, this is just the latest attempt to alter the rules to their favour).
If it wasn't just a shoddy attempt to build houses in green belt it might even get some support. Even as is now it never ceases to amaze me how people with money still ride roughshod over locals and planning laws all the time. (not always winning, this is just the latest attempt to alter the rules to their favour).
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
