AMEND YOUR SEARCH

Location

Minimum price

Maximum price

Bedrooms

Sort by


Refine your results Bedrooms Price Similar properties in ABOUT Hook Norton, Banbury, Oxfordshire
Gallery view List view Map view 32 properties found
Bridge House, Hook Norton
£850,000
5 Bedrooms
John D Wood
More »
Hook Norton, Banbury, Oxfordshire
£795,000
4 Bedrooms
Strutt & Parker - Banbury
More »
St Valentines, Hook Norton
£650,000
4 Bedrooms
Chancellors Estate Agents - Chipping Norton
More »
Queen Street, Hook Norton
£495,000 Sold STC
4 Bedrooms
King & Woolley - Chipping Norton
More »
HOOK NORTON
£465,000 Sold STC
4 Bedrooms
King & Woolley - Banbury
More »
Orchard Road, Hook Norton
£437,500
4 Bedrooms
King & Woolley - Banbury
More »
Hook Norton, Oxfordshire
£435,000 Sold STC
4 Bedrooms
King & Woolley - Banbury
More »
Hook Norton
£425,000 Sold STC
4 Bedrooms
King & Woolley - Banbury
More »
Sibford Road, Hook Norton
£399,995
4 Bedrooms
King & Woolley - Chipping Norton
More »
HOOK NORTON
£395,000
3 Bedrooms
King & Woolley - Banbury
More »
Hook Norton, Oxfordshire
£379,500 Sold STC
4 Bedrooms
King & Woolley - Chipping Norton
More »
Orchard Road, Hook Norton
£375,000 Sold STC
4 Bedrooms
King & Woolley - Chipping Norton
More »
Hot properties


2 bed, Watery Lane, Hook Norton, Banbury

£250,000, Strutt & Parker - Banbury


3 bed, St. Thomas Street, Deddington, Banbury, Oxfordshir

£270,000, Strutt & Parker - Banbury


3 bed, Salmons Lane, Middleton Cheney, Banbury

£310,000, Strutt & Parker - Banbury


2 bed, Bloxham, Banbury

£365,000, Strutt & Parker - Banbury


5 bed, Broughton Road, Banbury, Oxfordshire

£400,000, Strutt & Parker - Banbury


5 bed, Crouch Street, Banbury, Oxfordshire

£450,000, Strutt & Parker - Banbury


4 bed, Wroxton Lane, Horley, Banbury

£465,000, Strutt & Parker - Banbury

Moving House?
Local advertisers






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree